Las tasas sociales de retorno a I+D, científicos, ingenieros e inversiones en el sistema de educación terciaria: Evidencia internacional


  • Joilson Dias Universidade Stadual de Moringa
  • María Helena Ambrosio Dias Universidade Stadual de Moringa


Palabras clave:

Inversión, Educación


El objetivo de esta investigación es la estimación de las tasas sociales de retorno de la inversión en educación terciaria y su producto -I&D y científicos e ingenieros- en la economía. En la medición de este impacto social, tomamos en cuenta los problemas de endogeneidad, utilizando variables instrumentales. Los instrumentos utilizados son aquéllos sugeridos por Hall y Jones (1999). Los resultados econométricos muestran que las variables de inversión son endógenas al modelo y que los instrumentos representan efectivamente el capital social de las economías. Las tasas sociales de retorno estimadas para las inversiones en I&D, científicos e ingenieros, y en educación terciaria para 70 países están por encima del retorno privado, lo cual justificaría una orientación de las políticas.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Joilson Dias, Universidade Stadual de Moringa

Profesor-Investigador, Departamento de Economía, Universidade Stadual de Moringa, Brazil.

María Helena Ambrosio Dias, Universidade Stadual de Moringa

Profesora-Investigadora, Departamento de Economía, Universidade Stadual de Moringa, Brazil.


Adams, J. D. 1990. " Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth". Journal of Political Economy. 98(4):673-702.

Aghion, P ., and P. Howitt. 1998. Endogenous Growth Theory. London: The MIT Press.

Archibald, R. B ., and D. H. Finifter. 2003. "Evaluating the NASA Small Business Innovation Research Program: Preliminary Evidence of a Trade-Off Between Commercialization and Basic Research". Research Policy. 32(4) 605-619.

Audretsch, D. B. 1995. "Intellectual Property Rights. New Research Directions" In: Albach, H. and S. Rosenkranz, (eds). Intellectual Property Rights and Global Competition: Towards a New Synthesis. Berlin:WZB.

Baumol, W. J. 1990. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive". Journal of Political Economy. 90(5):893-921.

Bernstein, J. I. 1996. "R&D and Productivity Growth in Canadian Communications Equipment and Manufacturing". Industry Canada Working Paper 10, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Cameron, G., J. Proudman and S. Redding. 2004. "Technological Convergence, R&D, Trade and Productivity Growth". European Economic Review. Forthcoming.

Coe. D. T., E. Helpman and A. W. Hoffmaister. 1997. "North-South R&D Spillover". Economic Journal. 107(440): 134-139.

Damijan, J. P., M. Knell, B. Majcen and M. Rojec. 2003. “ The Role of FDI, R&D Accumulation and Trade in Transferring Technology to Transition Countries: Evidence From Firm Panel Data for Eight Transition Countries". Economic Systems. 27(2): 189-204.

Dias. J., and J. McDermott. 2005. "Education. Institutions, and Growth: The Role of Entrepreneurs". Journal of Development Economics. 80(2):299-328.

Djankov, S., R. LaPorta, F. Lopez-De-Silanes and A. Shleifer. 2002. "The Regulation of Entry". The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1): 1-37.

Frankel, J. A. and D. Romer, 1996. “Trade and Growth An Empirical Investigation". NBER Working Paper N° 5476.

Goldfarb. B., and M. Flenrekson. 2003. "Bottom-up Versus Top-Down Policies Towards the Commercialization of University Intellectual Property”. Research Policy.32(4): 639-658.

Gregorio, D. D. , and S. Shane. 2003. "Why do Some Universities Generate More Start- ups than Others?". Research Policy. 32(2):209-227.

Griffith, R. 2000. “ How Important is Business R&D for Economic Growth and Should the Government Subsidize it?". Institute For Fiscal Studies. Briefing Note N. 12.London.

Griliches, Z. 1994. R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Guellec, D ., and B. V. P. Potterie. 2001. "R&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD Countries". OECD-STI Working Papers 2001/3, Paris, France.

Hall, R. E. , and C. I. Jones. 1999. "Why do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output per Worker than Others?". The Quarterly Journal o f Economics.114(1):83-116.

Hauk, W. R., Jr., and R. Wacziarg. 2004. “A Monet Carlo Study of Growth Regressions". NBER Working Paper N° 296.

Hunter, B. F. 1992. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Gothenburg: Lanstryckeriet.

Jensen. R. A., J. G. Thursby and M. C. Thursby. 2003. “ Disclosure and Licensing of University Invetions: The Best We Can do With the S **t We Get to Work With". International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2 1 (9):1271 -1300.

Jones, C. I., and J. C. Williams. 1998. “ Measuring the Social Return to R&D". TheQuarterly Journal of Economics, 113(5): 1119-1135.

Lederman, D., and W. F. Maloney. 2003. “ R&D and Development". Office of the Chief Economist, Latin America and Caribbean, World Bank, Washington-DC.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2003. "US Science Parks: The Diffusion of an Innovation and Its Effects on the Academic Missions of Universities”. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (9): 1323-1356.

Link, A. N., J. T. Scott and D. S. Siegel. 2003. “The Economics of Intellectual Property at Universities: An Overview of the Special Issue". International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (9): 1217-1225.

Lucas Jr., R. J. 1988. "On the Mechanics of Economic Development". Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1):3-42.

Mankiw, G., D. Romer and D. Weil. 1992. “A Contribuition to the Empirics of economic growth". The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2): 407-437.

Nekar, A., and S. Shane. 2003. “ When do Start-ups that Exploit Patented Academic Knowledge Survive?”. International Journal of Industrial Organization,21 (9): 1391-1410.

Pagan, A.R., and A. D. Hall. 1983. "Diagnostic tests as residual analysis". Econometric Reviews. 2(1): 159-218.

Psacharopoulos, G. 2004. "Returns to investment in education: a further update". Education Economics, 12(2): 114-134.

Romer. P. M. 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change". Journal of Political Economy, 98(5) S7I-SI02.

Romer. P. M. 1996. "Why, Indeed, in America? Theory, History, and the Origins of Modern Economic Growth”. The American Economic Review, 86(2) 202-206.

Shane. S, 2004. "Encouraging University Entrepreneurship? The Effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on University Patenting in the United States". Journal of BusinessVenturing, 19(1): 127-151.

Sargan, J. D. 1958. "The Estimation of Economic Relationship Using Instrumental Variables". Econometrica, 26(2):393-415.

Shane. S., and S. Venkataraman. 2003. "Guest Editors' introduction to the Special Issue on Technology Entrepreneurship". Research Policy, 32(2): 181-184.

Scherer. F. M. 1982. "Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth". Review of Economic and Statistics, 64(3): 627-634.

Spencer, J. W . and C. Gomez. 2003 "The Relationship Among National Institutional Structures. Economic Factors, and Domestic Entrepreneurial Activity: A Multicountry Study" . Journal of Business Research, 5878(1): 1-10.

Sveikauskas, L. 1981. "Technological Inputs and Multifactor Productivity Growth", Review of Economic and Statistics, 63(2):275-282.

Vohora, A., M. Wright and A. Lockett. 2004 "Critical Junctures in the Development of University High-Tech Spinout Companies". Research Policy, 33(1): 147-175.

World Bank. 2001 World Development Indicators 2001. Washington: World Bank CD-ROM.

Wu, D. M. 1973 "Alternative Tests of Independence Between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances”. Econometrica, 46(4): 733-750.




Cómo citar

Dias, J., & Ambrosio Dias, M. H. (2006). Las tasas sociales de retorno a I+D, científicos, ingenieros e inversiones en el sistema de educación terciaria: Evidencia internacional. Revista Latinoamericana De Desarrollo Económico, 4(7), 9–28.

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.