Understanding Stakeholder Engagement and Community Resilience in the Ambi Watershed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35319/lajed.202543562Keywords:
Drought, stakeholder engagement, irrigation infrastructure, resilience, watershedAbstract
In the Ambi River basin of northern Ecuador, aging irrigation systems are increasingly strained by ecosystem degradation, exacerbated by persistent drought, ineffective management practices, and escalating pollution levels, leading to reduced irrigation efficiency. The upper and middle basin suffer from municipal, industrial, and agricultural waste, making the watershed vulnerable to water exploitation and quality issues. This study examines stakeholder engagement, focusing on resilience in socio-technical systems over inclusive cooperation. A Salinas irrigation system case study shows how farmers achieve mutual water use interests and resilience against scarcity, guided by social-hydrological resilience theory. The interviews show weak relationships between local organizations and government agencies, except in Salinas. Effective collaboration with irrigation boards has been developed in Salinas to rebuild old water structures. Improving community resilience to drought in the Ambi River basin can be achieved through stakeholder engagement. The paper argues that, despite recognizing the long-term impact of ecosystem damage due to poor water quality and drought, governmental water management decisions tend to benefit from a technical approach to resilience over sociohydrological decisions. This technical approach overlooks the critical importance of local social dynamics and multi-stakeholder engagements. In conclusion, the study highlights the need for improved stakeholder engagement and incorporating local social contexts into water management strategies to enhance community resilience to drought in the Ambi River basin.
Downloads
References
Akhmouch, A. & Clavreul, D. (2016). Stakeholder Engagement for Inclusive Water Governance: “Practicing What We Preach” with the OECD Water Governance Initiative. Water, 8(5):204.
Alsaawi, A. (2014). A critical review of qualitative interviews. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(4):149-156
Alves, F., Costa, P.M., Novelli, L., & Vidal, D.G. (2023). The rights of nature and the human right to nature: an overview of the European legal system and challenges for the ecological transition. Frontiers in Environmental Science, (11), 1175143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1175143
Andriof, J., Rahman, S.S., Waddock, S., & Husted, B. (2002). Introduction: JCC theme issue: Stakeholder responsibility. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (6), 16-19.
Asadzadeh, A., Kötter, T., Salehi, P., & Birkmann, J. (2017). Operationalizing a concept: The systematic review of composite indicator building for measuring community disaster resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, (25), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.015
Baarda, D.B., Bakker, E., Fischer, T., Julsing, M., Goede, M.P.M., Peters, V.A.M., & Vander Velden, T.M. (2013). Basisboek kwalitatief onderzoek: handleiding voor hetopzetten en uitvoeren van kwalitatief onderzoek. Groningen: Noordhoff Uitgevers.
Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2013). Community resilience: toward an integrated approach. Society & natural resources. 26(1):5-20.
Boelens, R., Escobar, A., Bakker, K., Hommes, L., Swyngedouw, E., Hogenboom, B., Huijbens, E.H., Jackson, S., Vos, J., Harris, L.M., Joy, K.J., Castro, F. de, Duarte-Abadía, B., Tubino de Souza, D., Lotz-Sisitka, H., Hernández Moral, N., Martínez-Alier, J., Roca-Servat, D., Perreault, T., Sanchis-Ibor, C., Suhardiman, D., Ulloa, A., Wals, A., Hoogesteger, J., Hidalgo-Bastidas, J.P., Roe-Avendano, T., Veldwisch, G.J., Woodhouse, P., & Wantzen, K.M. (2023). Riverhood: Political ecologies of socionature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(3): 1125-1156.
Boyd, D.R. (2018). Recognizing the Rights of Nature: Lofty Rhetoric or Legal Revolution? Natural Resources & Environment, 32(4), 13-17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26418846
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Carr, G. (2015). Stakeholder and public participation in river basin management- an introduction. Wires. Water. 2(4), 393-405.
Cork, S. (2010). Resilience of social-ecological systems. In S. Cork (ed.), Resilience and transformation: preparing Australia for uncertain futures. Chapter 15, pp. 131-142.
Denzin, N.K. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research, 1(1):23-46.
Dewulf, A., Karpouzoglou, T., Warner, J., Wesselink, A., Mao, F., Vos, J., Tamas, P., Groot, A.E., Heijmans, A., Ahmed, F., Hoang, L., Vij, S., & Buytaert, W. (2019). The power to define resilience in social–hydrological systems: Toward a power-sensitive resilience framework. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 6(6), e1377. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1377
Djalante, R. & Thomalla, F. (2010). Community resilience to natural hazards and climate change impacts: a review of definitions and operational frameworks. Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management (AJEDM), 3(3), 339-355.
D’Odorico, P., Laio, F., & Ridolfi, L. (2010). Does globalization of water reduce societal resilience to drought? Geophysical Research Letters. 37(13).
Ecuador. Gobierno Parroquial Rural “Santa Catalina de Salinas” (2016). Plan de desarrollo y ordenamiento territorial (PDOT). Salinas.
Espinosa, C. 2015. Interpretive Affinities: The Constitutionalization of Rights of Nature, Pacha Mama, in Ecuador. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 608-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1116379
Faulkner, L., Brown, K., & Quinn, T. (2018). Analysing community resilience as an emergent property of dynamic social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society. 23(1)24.
Fierro Guerrero, G.D.R., & Arteaga Valladolid, S.N. (2015). Valoración de la infraestructura de riego aplicado a Cuambo, parroquia Salinas, cantón Ibarra, provincia de Imbabura. [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Ecuador].
Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B.L., de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. The Academy of Management Annals 3(1):403-445
Garmestani, A.S., & Morgan, M. (2013). A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1377
Greenwood, D.J. (2007). Pragmatic action research. International Journal of Action Research, 3(1+ 2), 131-148.
Gudynas, E. (2015). Buen vivir. In: G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria & G. Kallis (eds.) Degrowth. A vocabulary for a new era (pp. 201-204). Routledge.
Holling, C.S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: P.E. Schulze (ed.), Engineering within Ecological Constraints, National Academy Press, Washington DC, (pp. 31-43).
Hutter, I., Hennink, M., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications Inc.
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement: past, present, and future. Business & Society. 61(5):1136-1196.
Lim, C.H., Wong, H.L., Elfithri, R., & Teo, F.Y. (2022). A Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Integrated River Basin Management. Water. 14(19), 2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14192973
Liguori, A., McEwen, L., Blake, J., & Wilson, M. (2021). Towards ‘creative participatory science’: exploring future scenarios through specialist drought science and community storytelling. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, 589856.
Madrigano, J., Chandra. A., Costigan, T., & Acosta. J.D. (2017). Beyond Disaster Preparedness: Building a Resilience-Oriented Workforce for the Future. International Journal of Environmental Research. 14(12),1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121563
Manyena, B., Machingura, F., & O’Keefe, P. (2019). Disaster Resilience Integrated Framework for Transformation (DRIFT): A new approach to theorising and operationalising resilience. World Development, 123, 104587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.011
Mao, F., Clark, J., Karpouzoglou, T., Dewulf, A., Buytaert, W., & Hannah, D. (2017). HESS Opinions: A conceptual framework for assessing socio-hydrological resilience under change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Science. 21,3655-3670.
Matarrita-Cascante, D., Trejos, B., Qin, H., Joo, D., & Debner, S. (2017). Conceptualizing community resilience revisiting conceptual distinctions. Community Development, 48(1),5-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2016.1248458
McGinnis, M.D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2),30.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2014). The OECD project on Stakeholder Engagement for Effective Water Governance. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/Summary-OECD-workshop-19Sept2014.pdf
---------- (2022). How Assess Water Governance: A Methodology Bases on the OECD Principles on Water Governance. https://web-archive.oecd.org/2022-06-24/627280-How_to_assess_water_governance.pdf
Ross, Alexander, & Heejun, Chang (2020). Socio-hydrology with hydrosocial theory: two sides of the same coin? Hydrological Sciences Journal. 65(9):1443-1457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1761023
Saja, A.M.A., Teo, M., Goonetilleke, Ziyath, A. (2021). A Critical Review of Social Resilience Properties and Pathways in Disaster Management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, (12), 790-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00378-y
Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H.H.G., & Blöschl, G. (2012). Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and wáter. Hydrological Processes, 26(8), 1270-1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8426
Tortajada, C. (2016). Water, Governance, and Infrastructure for Enhancing Climate Resilience. In C. Tortajada (ed.) Increasing Resilience to Climate Variability and Change. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer. Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1914-2_1
Vos, J., Boelens, R., & Kuper, M. (2020). Rooted water collectives: Towards an analytical framework. Ecological Economics, (173), 106651.
Wauben, N. (2020). Experiencing and responding to climate change in the Andes: campesino experiences with –and Responses to– changes in the climate in the Andean highlands of Southern Ecuador. University essay from SLU/Dept. of Urban and Rural Development. https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/15719/1/wauben_n_200626.pdf
WWF (World Wildlife Fun) (2019). Report of Health of the Binational Rivers Mira & Mataje, between Ecuador & Colombia. https://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/fichas_subcuencas_b9_web.pdf
Wurl, J., Gámez, A. E., Ivanova, A., Lamadrid, M.A.I., & Hernández-Morales, P. (2018). Socio-hydrological resilience of an arid aquifer system, subject to changing climate and inadequate agricultural management: a case study from the Valley of Santo Domingo, Mexico. Journal of Hydrology, (559), 486-498
Zautra, A., Hall, J., Murray, K. (2008). Community development and community resilience: An integrative approach. Community Development. 39(3), 130-147.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Latin American Journal of Economic Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
