Synthetic control analysis of the domestic impact of beef export restrictions in Bolivia

Authors

  • Rodrigo Burgoa Terceros Bolivian Catholic University "San Pablo"
  • Alejandro Herrera Jiménez Bolivian Catholic University "San Pablo"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35319/lajed.20162753

Keywords:

Synthetic control, quantitative restrictions to exports, beef production, domestic supply

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of the restriction policy on beef exports applied in Bolivia in 2008, as a result of the adverse effects of the phenomenon of ‘La Niña’ over the domestic supply of the same foodstuff. To carry out our estimations, we applied the Synthetic Control method with a data panel with 128 countries, including Bolivia between 1995 and 2013 including information on macroeconomic indicators, commercial, infrastructure and landlocked conditions, in order to construct a ‘synthetic’ counterfactual of comparison with Bolivia and then to approximate the impact of this policy over the results of the domestic market of the product. Empirically and as the conclusions of similar papers, we find that the implementation of this restrictive trade policy was counterproductive to its objective of gradually replenishing the domestic beef market. We argue that the export restriction policy implied a disincentive for beef producers, slowing the recovery of their productive activity after the adverse climatic events that motivated this policy implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rodrigo Burgoa Terceros, Bolivian Catholic University "San Pablo"

Professor at Bolivian Catholic University "San Pablo".

Alejandro Herrera Jiménez, Bolivian Catholic University "San Pablo"

Professor at Bolivian Catholic University "San Pablo" and Junior Researcher at INESAD Foundation.

References

Abadie, A., A. Diamond y J. Hainmueller. 2010. “Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505.

Abadie, A. y J. Gardeazabal. 2003. “The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country”. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132.

Abbott, P. 2011. “Export restrictions as stabilization responses to food crisis”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(2) 428-434.

Comisión Económica para América Latina. 2008. Evaluación del impacto acumulado adicional ocasionado por La Niña en 2008 en Bolivia. CEPAL: México.

Feenstra, R. C. 2015. Advanced International Trade: theory and evidence, Princeton University Press.

Gandolfo, G. 1998. International trade theory and policy, Roma, Italia: Springer.

García Lembergman, E., M. Rossi y R. Stucchi. 2015. “The impact of restrictions to export on production: A synthetic controls approach”. Working Paper, Universidad de San Andrés, (124), 1-22.

Krugman, P. y M. Obstfeld. 2006. Economía internacional: teoría y política. Madrid, España: Pearson.

Liefert, W., P. Westcott y J. Wainio. 2012. “Alternative policies to agricultural export bans that are less market-distorting”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(2), 435-441.

Markusen, J., J. Melvin, W. Kaempfer y K. Maskus. 1995. International Trade: Theory and Evidence, San Francisco, Estados Unidos: McGraw-Hill.

Mitra, S. y T. Josling. 2009. “Agricultural export restrictions: Welfare implications and trade disciplines”. International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council (IPC), 1-37.

Sharma, R. 2011. “Food export restrictions: Review of the 2007-2010 experience and considerations for disciplining restrictive measures”, FAO, 1-12.

Published

2016-12-05

How to Cite

Burgoa Terceros, R., & Herrera Jiménez, A. (2016). Synthetic control analysis of the domestic impact of beef export restrictions in Bolivia. Latin American Journal of Economic Development, 14(27), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.35319/lajed.20162753